I’ve noticed lately that the medical/pharmaceutical/industrial complex (MPIC), and especially the pediatricians, is getting its shorts in a bunch because informed American parents are beginning to question the science and sanity of our present infant vaccination schedule. The surprise here for me is not that the MPIC, concerned about financial loss and patient control, is bombarding the media with scare tactics about the hazards of non-vaccination, but that sufficient numbers of adequately informed parents are rebelling against archaic laws and regulations and refusing to vaccinate their toddlers.
Once upon a time, we doctors were the information source for our patients and the population in general. If you needed to know (about anything regarding health or disease), you had to rely on your M.D., your D.C., your D.O., your D.D., etc. Those days are gone. The information highway, Google in particular, is loaded with information on virtually any given subject, both orthodox and alternative, and is available to anyone with a computer or a library card. The National Vaccine Information Center recently established open access to the following journal article, which I found of considerable importance given the current media fear oriented barrage of misinformation.
The study I am referring too, published in Human and Experimental Toxicology and indexed by the National Library of Medicine is entitled Infant Mortality Rates Regressed Against Number of Vaccine Doses Routinely Given: Is There a Biochemical or Synergistic Toxicity? The study found that:
- Developed nations with higher infant mortality rates tend to give their infants more vaccine doses. For example, the USA requires 26 vaccines, yet more than six (6) US infants die per 1000 live births. In contrast, Sweden and Japan administer 12 vaccines, the least number, and report fewer than three (3) deaths per 1000 live births.
- There is a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates.
- A closer inspection of correlations between vaccine doses, biochemical or synergistic toxicity, and infant mortality rates was essential.
- All nations, rich and poor, advanced and developing, have an obligation to determine whether their immunization schedules are achieving their desired goals.
- The USA spends more per capita on health care that any other country, yet 33 nations have better infant mortality rates.
- Some infant deaths attributed to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) may be vaccine related, perhaps due to over vaccination.
- Progress on reducing infant deaths should include monitoring immunization schedules and official causes of death (to determine if vaccine related infant deaths are being reclassified).
- Infant mortality rates will remain high in developing nations that can not provide clean water, proper nutrition, improved sanitation, and better access to health care.
The authors of this study were Neil Z. Miller and Gary S. Goldman.
The deaths that appear to be related to vaccination are obviously a serious concern, but as a practitioner whose practice is sixty plus percent pediatric, I’m reminded of the hundreds of parents who have presented at my office complaining that their child was normal until shortly after vaccination. These parents still have a child, but with brain damage and behavioral challenges. The numbers for autistic spectrum disordered children in the USA are greater than 100 cases per 1000 children. Those numbers increased as the number of vaccinations required has increased. In fact, it has become such an obvious problem that it has been suggested that autistic spectrum disorders be reclassified, which is an excellent way to hide a mess under the rug. Obviously, money is more important to the MPIC than the nation’s children. I’m angry! Are you?
NAET has proven to be a useful tool in helping the child diagnosed with an autistic spectrum disorder recover. Many alternative authorities believe that it is primarily the antimicrobial portions of vaccines that are causing so much trouble. Both Aluminum and Mercury are used; both are neurotoxic (poison to the brain and nervous system). Both of these toxic heavy metals have been associated with the advent of Leaky Gut Syndrome, which appears to be the cause of most allergy/sensitivity.
In my experience, children with autistic spectrum disorders often respond well to a combination of NAET for the elimination of allergy/sensitivity, a detoxification program for the removal of toxic heavy metals and other contaminants, and a nutritional program designed to support neurological regeneration.
More information on Leaky Gut Syndrome may be found in the previous newsletter and at Leaky Gut Syndrome, the Villain Behind Allergy/Sensitivity, and How Do You Know If You Have It
